Re: Tao Te Ching 1
Silent Temple said May 19, 11:35 PM:
One The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao The name that can be named is not the eternal name Bede Griffiths expressed this another way, “Once the Word is spoken, It is defiled.” Here, also, we see the Tao is much more than can be grasped intellectually. It is existentially realized and engaged as no mind – pure realization undefiled by concepts. The nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth That which gave rise to this gross realm cannot be apprehended, circumscribed, or justifiably named as an entity or object. The named is the mother of ten thousand things Perhaps a better way to have expressed this is that the namer is the mother of ten-thousand things. However, once a name is recognized, the mind then holds the capacity for endless naming and dualistic regard. Ever desireless, one can see the mystery To realize the Mystery, we require completeness and sufficiency in the moment as the moment – not egoistically apprehending something for some end(s), but rather wholly being as necessary and sufficient onto its non-self. Ever desiring, one can see the manifestations In desire, things become objects for perceived potential self-completion. When we are in need, the objects of our need and opposing elements become separate entities in a dualistic display. We grasp. And in that grasping, we apprehend the finite, limited, and dual. Countless things arise as separate entities. Emptiness is repressed. Duality arises. These two spring from the same source but differ in name; Both non-desire and desire are linguistic objects of the same source, the dualistic mind. Hence, they are named. This appears as darkness Darkness within darkness The gate to all mystery However, mind is not condemned to perpetual duality. And fully experiencing duality, it progressively becomes darkness within darkness, dissatisfactory and meaningless – opening the gate to all Mystery, The Void, The Void of Transformation leading to Being, existential Mystery.
|