| |
|
|
Re: ZPod:Climate Change 101
Inukshuk said Aug 25, 2007, 3:09 PM:
I am completely for talking about what we can individually and collectively do to mitigate and also adapt to global warming (in the short term, the temperature will rise regardless of what we do now). I believe there are many areas of discussion about this and much to learn. I do not think North America has even thought about the adaptation part of the equation (the scientists in individual countries have, but I haven't heard anything from the politicians).
From being on other blogs and just starting on this one, I have to say that I am completely opposed, now that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has almost completed putting out the four parts of its climate change report, that we are, on this pod, to waste time discussing those scientists or conservatives who have not accepted the basic fact that climate change is “unequivocal” and “anthropogenic” (caused by man).
I do not think it is a useful exercise to try to learn about all the ways that global warming skeptics have of trying to continue the discussion about whether the basic facts are real or not. The media, at least in Canada, have stopped giving equal time to the skeptics. The articles are now about a huge variety of topics about greening businesses or products, or buildings, or….. many other things.
I know this, because I have wasted my time when I come across skeptics, in trying to locate all the sources behind the items they choose to bring forward. There are many, many more important things I could be doing with the time.
What I should be doing (as I do not believe skeptics have any intention of opening their minds to the facts), is just saying to myself: Do I rely on a voluminous report (hundreds of pages long) by the leading scientists around the world (2000+), whether they wrote parts or peer-reviewed it, as scientists do to their research? Or do I listen to one or two individuals who will never give up their opinions. Fact versus opinion. I'm sorry, I have to choose fact. We do not need to provide rebuttals to each line of questioning of skeptics. They know that we are not scientists, which is what they rely on. Well, there are not generally not scientists and certainly not reputable scientists.
I find there tends to be a disproportionate number of skeptics on many blogs as there should be for society as a whole. Both Americans and Canadians on the whole are aware of the important of global warming. We do not need to convince everyone to change minds that are already closed.
Let's spend time sharing information or reflections or experience among those with open minds instead.
|